Tag Archives: BP

Farewell party for BP sponsorship at Tate Modern

After 18 artistic interventions over six years, campaign group ‘Liberate Tate‘ held an unofficial party this afternoon in the Turbine Hall to celebrate the news that Tate Modern is finally free of its 26 year long arrangement with BP.

Campaign pressure on the criminal oil company is widely regarded as one of the main reasons they have given up their deal with the gallery, although news reports cited the “challenging business environment“.

Recent Freedom of Information requests indicate that the amount of money BP gives the gallery each year is smaller than one hour’s profit, so it seems more likely they have weighed up the substantial PR gains they get from such arrangements against the bad press they regularly receive as campaign groups stage their protests and that the protests are just too damaging to the company.

Activists smuggled a sound system into the hall this afternoon and danced, drank, and ate cake.

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 002

Children played under and around the black square (resurrected from a previous action).

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 001

Veiled performers delivered their artists’ statement.

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 003

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 007

Two activists somehow accessed a beam very high up above the crowd and dropped black confetti creating a massive spectacle for the visiting public.

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 004

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 005

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 008

 

After a couple of hours, most of the confetti was packed away in bags and activists bade a final farewell to the museum, while a police inspector tried to work out how the confetti stunt had been pulled.

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 009

Liberate Tate © @indyrikki 2016 010

Another campaign group, ‘BP or not BP‘, will continue their pressure on the British Museum where the new director, Hartwig Fischer, is currently deciding whether to renew BP’s sponsorship deal there.

See also ‘TimePiece‘, my short film of a 24-hour occupation at Tate Modern last year.

 

 

Advertisements

Climate March and policing 7th March 2015

It is hard to understand why yesterday’s Climate March attracted many fewer than in Autumn, other than that the corporate media, owned by a handful of right-wing billionaires, is successfully misdirecting the public by continually ignoring or playing down the pressing scientific argument against the stranglehold of oil multi-nationals on national and international energy policy.

Still, several thousand angry folk gathered in Lincoln’s Inn Fields at lunchtime, before a bike bloc led the march towards Parliament.

01 climate march

03 climate march

There was a pause for a sit-down on the Strand, lasting around ten minutes, and there was also a detour by an anarchist bloc which turned off Whitehall and looped back into the rear of Parliament Square to establish the #occupydemocracy gathering due to follow the climate rally.

04 climate march

05 climate march

06 climate march

Prior to the march there was controversy over the Met’s demand that organisers pay for private road management – a position they retreated from later. In their original reasoning, they claimed that there was no need for any police presence because their core responsibility was “preventing and detecting crime, maintenance of the Queen’s Peace and protecting life and property”, and that because there the proposed march was “expected to be crime-free there was little requirement for it to provide a policing operation”.

So it was interesting that the event was not only fully policed, but that there was also a marked ramping-up of surveillance, with several FIT teams filming protesters, and a huge number of blue-tabarded “Liaison Officers”.

A smiley "liaison officer" from the National Domestic Extremist Special Operations branch

A smiley “liaison officer” from the National Domestic Extremist Special Operations branch

They seem to have given up any pretence that they are not gathering intelligence, with more and more of them sporting Public Order (CO) lapel badges, one Sergeant showing his SO (Domestic Extremist/Terrorist Specialist Operations), several Tactical Support Group officers (whose usual liaison with protesters involve shoving, punching or batoning them!), and out of their usual beat, several City of London police and some Detective Inspectors from Kent.

Perhaps this huge increase in intelligence gathering was a celebration of the Supreme Court’s ruling last week, in the John Catt case, that for the moment legitimises the wide-scale collection and retention of intelligence for “police purposes” that may include studying the “leadership, organisation, tactics and methods” as well as “links between protest groups”.

After the speeches and rally, one group of around a hundred activists headed off to block the steps of Tate Britain in protest at their sponsorship deals with BP, which provide huge amounts of greenwash and free advertising to the disgraced oil company in return for financial support which amounts to less than 1% of the Tate’s budget.

Another larger group, led by a ‘carbon bubble’ and huge dinosaur, took a stroll across Westminster Bridge and rallied outside the Shell HQ on the South Bank, where there were a few minor scuffles as TSG officers, protecting the corporation, tried to burst the bubble and snatch a few placards.

07 climate march

08 climate march

After some speeches there, the several hundred protesters began to head back over the bridge to re-occupy Parliament Square, but suddenly things took a dark turn. The same group of TSG that had been observing protesters earlier in the Square, and who were involved in scuffles at Shell, suddenly decided in the middle of the bridge to snatch someone and arrest them on the strange premise that they had previously committed a Section 5 public order offence in Humberside. This character had been noisily playing a tambourine in Parliament Square during the afternoon, was very visible around the Shell protest, and was clearly heading back to the Square, so why the police chose to so publicly snatch him in the middle of the bridge is a mysterious lapse in judgement.

Inevitably, his arrest, and claims that the arrest was completely unfounded, led to the prisoner van being surrounded by protesters, with costumed polar bears staging a sit-in in front of the van.

09 climate march

For the next 45 minutes, ever increasing numbers of police fought to clear a path for the van to exit, with many protesters receiving injuries in the process, despite the overwhelming majority acting peacefully.

10 climate march

11 climate march

12 climate march

During the operation, another three people were arrested, including an NUJ journalist.

Even when the van finally made an escape along York Road, it got held up by traffic and some activists tried to halt its progress further, but in a terrifying few moments, the driver gradually built up speed, as protesters ran backwards with their hands on the bonnet, until eventually they realised he literally might kill them, and they span off to the side.

13 climate march

14 climate march

Serious questions must be asked about whether the police were wise to attempt the original arrest in the middle of a large crowd in the middle of a bridge, and then whether their ensuing operation and escalating violence was proportionate in order to question someone about an historic alleged minor public order offence.

Once things had calmed down, the crowd returned to Parliament Square, where, under intense further surveillance, a group of up to a hundred held a meeting and then enjoyed some conscious poet and music entertainment into the evening from the likes of David Willard, Pete the Temp, and Danny Chivers.

16 climate march

17 climate march

Occupy Democracy organised prisoner support at Charing Cross police station so that as people were released they were met with a friendly welcome and some food etc. It took the full 24 hours for the last of the four to be released.

Occupy Democracy have announced they will be in Parliament Square during the election period from 1st till 10th May, and Liberty have just had the go ahead to launch a judicial review on the legality of the GLA’s closing of the Square to protests.

15 climate march

Flash-spill at British Museum as BP sponsorship under attack

In the same way that tobacco companies eventually had to face that they could no longer maintain an image of philanthropy while securing massive cheap advertising through sponsorship, nearly a decade later, the tide is turning against oil companies, and BP in particular.

The actual worth of individual sponsorship deals is a closely-guarded secret, and indeed the subject of scrutiny in the High Court last week under a Freedom of Information challenge from Request Initiative. But BP has admitted to giving around £2 million pounds split between the Royal Opera House, the Tate galleries, the National Portrait Gallery, and the British Museum. This is the amount of profit generated in about an hour and a half according to record profit figures announced this week.

So what do they get for this drop in the ocean? Well, first is a massive amount of tax-free and cheap advertising, plastering their brand all over events, merchandise, and banners. Second, a profound greenwashing effect, as their brand becomes associated with high-end art and beautiful spaces, rather than with global tax-avoidance, and the pollution, destruction and mayhem caused by their true core business.

Campaigners point out that if oil companies paid fair taxes, the arts could easily be adequately funded and sponsorship would become unnecessary. And it seems more and more people are agreeing with them. The tide is turning against the fossil fuel industry in just the same way that it did against tobacco a decade and more ago.

With the recent US court verdict that BP was ‘grossly negligent’ and its ‘recklessness’ caused the deaths of 11 workers at the Deepwater Horizon disaster in April 2010, arts activist group “BP or not BP” attracted support from some London Quakers as well as meditation activists “Dharma Action Network for Engaging Climate (DANCE)” to perform a “flash-spill” at the British Museum on Sunday morning ahead of the massive People’s Climate March.

After laying a large shiny oil-spill (made from cloth) in front of the entrance to the BP-sponsored Ming exhibition, they performed a short tableau about the Deepwater Horizon disaster, comprising spoken verses about the effects of oil spill interspersed with the chorus:
BP is guilty of gross negligence, why does the British Museum stand by? BP is guilty of gross negligence, why is this museum promoting its lies?

After laying 11 flowers for the 11 human victims of BP negligence, and depicting the wildlife and other workers affected, they were joined by the meditation and Quaker supporters and sat in silence for 11 minutes.

After a peaceful exit, they posed with their ‘slick’ for more press photos on the steps of the museum, before joining the Climate March in Viking garb (a reference to a previous protest performance).

Earlier in the week, the BP-sponsored Royal Opera House big screen live projection in Trafalgar Square was interrupted by an activist dance and chanting, and the previous week, what at first appeared to be a huge art installation in Tate Modern’s Turbine hall turned out to be a protest about Tate’s refusal to comply with a Freedom of Information request about BP sponsorship.

With all this attention, despite record profits, BP must be beginning to feel the strain.

If you want to help force BP out of the arts, then look at bp-or-not-bp.org for some simple ideas of actions you can take.

Activists dance at BP Big Screen event

Yesterday evening, activists from @BPOutOfOpera targeted a ‘BP Big Screen’ event at Trafalgar Square, London.

Minutes before the Royal Opera House live broadcast, they performed a symbolic dance in which culture eventually overcomes oil sponsorship.

The action passed off peacefully and got a warm reception from the audience in the packed square on an Indian Summer evening.

‘BP Out of Opera” are one of many groups targeting BP’s greenwash sponsorship of the arts.

For much less money than the equivalent in commercial advertising, oil companies plaster their logo over exhibitions and events (last night giving everyone a free and brightly logo-ed baseball cap), while also cleaning up their image by associating themselves with public art.

Meanwhile those same corporations dodge tax and receive public subsidies on a huge scale – money that would easily cover the sponsorship deals many times over and help pay for education, welfare and health.

Art institutions are very secretive about the level of sponsorship they receive, and currently there is a high court case against Tate to try to uncover the figure, thought to be as little as half a per cent of the gallery’s budget.

BP has recently been declared guilty of ‘gross negligence’ by a US judge over the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, which caused huge environmental damage and killed 11 workers.

By showing up at galleries and events, groups like BP Out Of Opera remind the public that BP are not such nice art sponsors, and that the Arts would be better off without them.

Hidden figures and black squares at Tate Modern

On Thursday a New Orleans judge found BP guilty of gross negligence over their Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Although the trial also involved contractors Halliburton and Transocean, US District Judge Carl Barbier singled out BP for their “recklessness” and he placed most of the blame on them.

In London, art activists ‘Liberate Tate’ have long campaigned against Tate Modern’s association with BP, and this weekend saw their latest bold action in the Turbine Hall of the museum.

Later this month, Tate Modern faces a court appearance themselves in front of the Information Commissioner over their refusal to disclose how much money they actually receive from BP. The Tate Modern governors’ meeting minutes, requested under the Freedom of Information rules by Liberate Tate, were heavily redacted with black squares.

Ironic then that a black square is on display at the gallery as part of their Malevich exhibition.

Playing with the interconnected themes, yesterday’s art activism began at 1pm with a huge 8 x 8 metre black square of cloth pulled out from a conveniently placed child’s pram.

01 liberate tate

Black clad performers then raised the cloth, and over the course of the next couple of hours, continually played with it, often lowering it on teams of choreographed people to create various shapes.

02 liberate tate

07 liberate tate

The installation attracted much public interest, and spontaneous choreography was encouraged. It was also a magnet for children who enjoyed the spectacle and immersed themselves in the tactile darkness under the material.

09 liberate tate

There were no fliers and no chants – this was a subtle and arty protest only explained by a small information board in the style of Tate Modern info plaques, that offered up the piece as “Hidden Figures (2014)” and neatly explained how the museum tries to hide its figures re sponsorship (currently believed to be around just half a per cent of the gallery’s budget). While much of the public may have thought the piece was a commissioned work, I am sure the symbolism and press coverage will come over loud and clear to the gallery’s governors.

05 liberate tate

04 liberate tate

Towards the end of the performance, the artists (and public) layed down in a square under the cloth, and then it was removed and dragged up the slope, leaving a square of silent bodies who arose one by one and quietly left.

03 liberate tate

08 liberate tate

06 liberate tate

‘Liberate Tate’ believe it is time for Tate Modern to disassociate itself from the criminally negligent polluters, BP.

Remember 11 innocent workers met their death in the Gulf.

Back with a little film about BP sponsorship of the arts

After a busy time and an untended blog, I return with news of a lovely action by the “Art Not Oil” coalition at the National Portrait Gallery.

Tonight, the gallery is celebrating its 25th year of BP sponsorship of the Portrait Awards, and to mark this sorry milestone in green-washing, we launch our short film of the serene “25 Portraits In Oil” action that took place in the gallery at the weekend.

 

‘Art Not Oil’ staged a peaceful visual protest at the National Portrait Gallery at the weekend.

While BP are celebrating their long association with the gallery, Archbishop Desmond Tutu says:

“Twenty-five years ago people could be excused for not knowing much, or doing much, about climate change. Today we have no excuse.
Those companies primarily responsible for emitting carbon and accelerating climate change are simply not going to give up. They need a whole lot of gentle persuasion from the likes of us.
We can encourage our universities and municipalities and cultural institutions to cut their ties to the fossil-fuel industry”.

Sponsorship arrangements with prestigious art institutions provide oil companies with an image of being “good corporate citizens” while in reality their main business model depends on destroying a safe and habitable climate for all of us.

The amount of finance they contribute to institutions is actually tiny in terms of overall budgets, and if oil companies paid their taxes without huge subsidies and massive loopholes, the money raised would hugely exceed the small contributions the oil companies make in return for their and apparent generosity.

Web: artnotoil.org.uk
Twitter: @artnotoil | #BPPortrait
Facebook: End oil-sponsorship of the Arts

Activist film spoofs BP-sponsored Viking exhibition at British Museum

On the 24th March, as the British Museum promoted its Viking exhibition in cinemas around the country using the #VikingsLive hashtag, activists hijacked the twittersphere and sent around 1300 visitors to my spoof film highlighting BP’s greenwash.

A few weeks ago, I came across the British Museum’s short promo film for their flagship “Vikings” exhibition. I was annoyed that the end of the film sported the BP logo as sponsor, especially after discovering that the actual amount this destructive oil corporation gave was just a miniscule 1% of the museum’s annual budget – for which they get an enormous amount of cheap publicity and greenwash.

So, I wondered if there was a way to undermine BP’s cynical marketing ploy by spoofing the film. The idea took on a life of its own when various people came together to help me, and I became director, cameraman, editor, and composer, aided by a dedicated small team of actors, make-up, costume and props folk. We filmed the ‘BP Vikings’ in an occupied fitness centre in Camden, where the squatters kindly gave us use of their hall to hang up a huge green screen for the shoot. Background scenes were filmed in Brighton and North London, and after some compositing and additional graphics, the 75 second spoof was finished.

On Thursday 24th April, the British Museum promoted its exhibition with a live walk-through at 70 cinemas. As a result of activists’ use of the #VikingsLive hashtag, around 1300 visitors watched the video on that day alone.

Links:
ORIG FILM:  http://britishmuseum.org/vikings
– Shortlink:  http://is.gd/L4VJAT

SPOOF FILM:  http://vimeo.com/92032352
– Shortlink:  http://is.gd/C0frhJ